A study of humes views on kants concept of god

Copleston approaches some aspects of philosophy from a Roman Catholic perspective, but in general offers erudite and insightful Christian critiques. The accounts of miraclesas presented in scripture and elsewhere, are supposed to confirm the authenticity and authority of scripture and the prophets and, more importantly, establish that God has revealed himself to human beings through these special acts or events.

Based on these arguments, Hume concludes that reason alone cannot motivate anyone to act. He points out that we can observe order in many mindless processes, such as generation and vegetation.

Given these considerations regarding the causes of evil, and the limits of human understanding, what is the most reasonable hypothesis concerning the first cause of the universe?

Immanuel Kant

Clearly, then, in so far as we have any idea of causation as it exists in the world, we must conclude that thought and consciousness can indeed arise from matter and motion as the materialists maintain. He was Scottish by descent and had a type of very conservative upbringing known as Pietism.

Macmillan, Hume left the discussion with the opinion that we have an instinctual belief in induction, rooted in our own biological habits, that we cannot shake and yet cannot prove. In an especially important passage, which was inserted into the Dialogues shortly before Hume died, Philo elaborates on his view.

Is God able to prevent evil but unwilling to do so? First, we need to address why we should study philosophy at all, particularly the variety that tends to harm rather than help Christianity. To look for a unifying self beyond those perceptions is like looking for a chain apart from the links that constitute it.

Hume pointed out that we can just as easily imagine a world of chaos, so logic cannot guarantee our inductions. The presence of evil suggests God is either all-powerful but not completely good or he is well-meaning but unable to destroy evil, and so not all-powerful.

It is this assumption that needs to be established, so we must not assume it in our reasoning. Several different strategies are available to the theist to defuse this problem — that is, theodicies of various kinds.

Robert Velarde is author of Conversations with C. The evidence telling against the occurrence of a miracle must always constitute a full proof — since we have uniform human experience in support of the laws of nature EU, If you hold a medium between affirmation and negation, by saying, that the justice of the gods, at present, exerts itself in part but not to its full extent; I answer, that you have no reason to give it any particular extent, but only so far as you see it, at present, exert itself.

Clearly, then, the atheist may concede that there is some remote analogy between God and human minds and still insist that there remain other analogies and hypotheses that are no less plausible. According to Cleanthes, it is similarly perverse and unnatural to deny that the various parts of the body and the way in which they are suited to our environment e.

We have no experience of any Zs at all. Although this method is essential to empiricism and the scientific method, there is always something inherently uncertain about it, because we may acquire new data that are different and that disprove our previous conclusions.Hume and Kant offered two differing views on morality.

Hume's philosophy regarding moral theory came from the belief that reason alone can never cause action.

Difference Between Kant and Hume

Hume's philosophy regarding moral theory came from the belief that reason alone can never cause action. Hume's Views on Kant's Concept of God For Hume, all objects of human reason are divided into two kinds: Relations of Ideas and Matters of fact.

All reasoning of matters of fact are founded on Cause and Effect. Cause and Effect play a big role in Hume's philosophy. David Hume is a man of logic, who believes in experience over knowledge. David Hume and Immanuel Kant each made a significant break from other theorists in putting forward a morality that doesn’t require a higher being or god, for a man to recognize his moral duty.

Although Hume and Kant shared some basic principals they differed on their view of morality. Start studying Philosophy: Descartes, Hume, and Kant.

Hume on Religion

Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. meaning of the word God when it is understood a certain way or by referring to the purpotedly unique qualities of the concept of God.

Materialism. The view that knowing consists of two distinct aspects. Kant examines these proofs in the reverse order from the one in which they are presented.

He begins with the transcendental proof because it alone provides, on its. The issue of existence and justification of the Supreme Being is constantly approached by Immanuel Kant in his entire work.

For Kant, the ultimate goal of the nature created by God id man as a moral being: the world was created according to man's moral needs.

A study of humes views on kants concept of god
Rated 0/5 based on 44 review